TheBeefSite.com - news, features, articles and disease information for the beef industry

AHDB European Market Survey


14 May 2012

AHDB European Market Survey - 11 May 2012AHDB European Market Survey - 11 May 2012

The cow market in the EU has remained firm so far in 2012 and prices have moved up steadily from July last year onwards, similarly to male cattle prices (see EMS12/17).

AHDB

EU cow prices rising further

There has been ongoing strong demand for cow beef, especially for forequarter cuts, at a time when cow beef supply has been tight. Declining supplies of prime beef have also contributed to the firm cow beef market. The cow beef forequarter market is being driven by strong demand for mince, as consumers trade down to cheaper cuts. Export demand for cow beef from non-EU markets has also remained firm.

The EU price for grade O3 cows reached a record high of €309 per 100 kg dw in the week ended 29 April, up nine per cent compared with the beginning of the year and 16 per cent more than at the end of April last year. Normally there is a seasonal rise in the New Year but, somewhat unusually, there was no seasonal fall last autumn.

France has a major bearing on developments on the EU cow beef market, being the largest producer, consumer and importer. Demand has remained firm and cow beef production in the first quarter of 2012 was unchanged on a year earlier. The O3 price rose nine per cent in the first four months of 2012 and was 14 per cent higher than at the end of April last year. The extent to which this is being driven by the strong demand for forequarters is illustrated by the fact that the Rungis wholesale price for grade R at the end of April was up 35 per cent year on year at the end of April, compared with a rise of 13 per cent in hindquarters. Wholesale cow beef prices have also been firm in Germany so that the price for grade O3 cows at the end of April was up 12 per cent compared with the beginning of January and 17 per cent compared with the end of April last year. German cow slaughterings between January and April were unchanged on a year earlier.

The Netherlands is the fourth largest cow beef producer and also a major importer for its domestic processing industry. Prices there moved up by nine per cent in the first four months of 2012 and by the end of April were up 13 per cent on a year earlier. Price rises have been especially marked in the UK and the O3 price, in euro terms, at the end of April was up 10 per cent compared with the beginning of the year and 24 per cent more than at the end of April last year. The UK is a major exporter of cow beef and slaughterings in the first quarter of 2012 were down nine per cent on a year earlier while in Ireland, another significant exporting country, slaughterings in January to April 2012 were down two per cent with prices also firm.

Brazilian beef exports decline continues into 2012

Brazilian beef and veal exports continued to decline year on year in the first quarter of 2012. This is a result of ongoing reductions in beef and veal production and stronger domestic demand relative to export demand. Exporters have been experiencing some downturn in global demand in recent months, a situation not helped by high Brazilian cattle prices and the strong real, even though it has eased back against the US dollar since last July. Fresh and frozen shipments were down six per cent in the first three months of 2012 and export prices in US dollars were unchanged.

Russia remained the most important destination for Brazilian beef despite a decline in shipments as the temporary ban on imports of animal products from three Brazilian states announced last June remains in place. Consequently shipments to Russia in the first quarter of 2012 were down 13 per cent on a year earlier. Shipments to Iran, the second largest market for Brazilian beef a year ago, were down 92 per cent as diplomatic relations between the two countries have become strained, leading to difficulties obtaining Iranian import licenses.

Egypt became the second largest destination for Brazilian beef and veal overtaking Iran, Venezuela and Hong Kong. Shipments were up by 240 per cent in the first quarter due to a recovery in import demand. After a considerable decrease in the first quarter of 2011, beef and veal exports to Hong Kong experienced a significant recovery in the first quarter of 2012, with volumes 51 per cent higher than last year. Venezuela also experienced a significant increase year on year.

While still low in a historical context, shipments to the EU increased by 12 per cent, largely as a result of increased shipments to Italy. Trade with the EU continues to suffer from the low number of EU approved cattle farms; in early March the figure was 1,948 a situation exacerbated by lower EU demand. The Brazilian Association of Meat Export Industries (ABIEC) is expecting an increase in the number of farms approved to supply the EU during the course of this year, with a consequent increase in shipments.

For all the markets covered above shipments consisted almost entirely of frozen beef. Exports of fresh beef increased by nearly 50 per cent but still only accounted for 13 per cent of Brazilian exports. The main growth in chilled exports was to Chile with shipments more than trebling.

According to the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), cattle slaughterings in 2011 were almost two per cent down on 2010 at 28.8 million head while beef production declined by three per cent to 6.8 million tonnes given a fall in carcase weights, a situation not helped by drought conditions in some parts of the country. Market reports indicate that production continued to fall in early 2012.

Update on CAP reform debates

Over the last few weeks there have been a series of meetings in Brussels on the reform of direct payments, referred to as Pillar 1, of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). As the proposals currently stand, no area in the debate has reached common consensus, with Member States still widely split on most items.

There has been a lot of interest in the Commission’s definition of an active farmer. According to the proposals, recipients must get at least five per cent of their income from agricultural activities, excluding any subsidies. However, it remains unclear as to how this will be calculated and whether it will be determined by revenue or by net returns. Member States have expressed concerns about the administrative difficulties in implementing the Commission’s current definition. According to industry sources, Denmark and the UK are understood to be in favour of supporting the creation of a ‘negative list’ of holdings not eligible for CAP support, such as golf courses and sports facilities.

The proposals indicate that payments for active farmers are to be re-allocated, with a single scheme across the EU, the basic payment scheme. This will put an end to historical payments by 2019, in favour of an entitlements scheme allocated at national or regional level. This will see farmers in the same region receive the same level of payments per eligible hectare. Sources indicate that few Member States favour the proposal as it currently stands. Several, including the UK, have said that the end of historical payments by 2019 is too quick a transition. Other Member States, particularly from Eastern Europe, have argued against moving towards a flat rate.

Current proposals indicate that 30 per cent of direct support will be made conditional on greening. Sources indicate that at present only France and Germany are in favour of the proposals. A number of Member States argue that greening measures should be voluntary, while others argue that 30 per cent is too high. The UK has suggested that the greening component of direct payments runs contrary to the Commission’s aims of simplification and that it should instead be included under the CAP’s Pillar 2, which specifically addresses Rural Development. An alternative greening proposal has been put forward by a group of Member States, referred to as the Stockholm Group. The proposal suggests scrapping the EU’s proposals of 30 per cent of direct payments, instead requiring governments to choose from one of three broader measures.

Another topic in the CAP debate is the introduction of phased-in caps on payments, with reductions on amounts above €150,000 and a limit to payments of €300,000. Capping rates would only be calculated once salaries, taxes and social contributions related to employment are taken into account. This means that farmers with a higher wage bill will not be penalised, while the greening element is excluded. Industry sources have indicated that Ireland, France and Spain support the proposal, although France has called for more discussion on the issue and Spain has suggested that it is too complex. Germany and the UK are against the current proposal, as it penalises large farmers.

With many aspects of the proposals for CAP reform still unclear, the EU Commission has announced that it will be publishing a series of ‘non-papers’ (informal explanatory notes) by the end of June 2011. These will aim to provide more detail on the draft legislative proposals and allow for more informed discussions. Areas where more details have been called for include greening, capping and the definition of an active farmer.

DOWNLOAD REPORT:- Download this report here

Our Sponsors

Partners


Seasonal Picks

Animal Welfare in EPS - 5m Books